Choosing The Route of Hysterectomy
/Here’s the RoshReview Question of the Week!
A 49-year-old P3003 woman presents to the clinic with a complaint of heavy menses for several years and asks for definitive management. She has a history of type 4 fibroids, all < 3 cm, and hypercholesterolemia. Her obstetrical history is significant for two vaginal deliveries and one cesarean section. On physical examination, her BMI is 31 kg/m2. Her uterus is anteverted, and the fundus reaches 3 fingerbreadths below the umbilicus. What surgical intervention would be most cost- and clinically effective for this patient?
Check if you got the right answer at the links above!
Reading: Committee Opinion 701 - Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease
Why do we do a hysterectomy?
- Hysts are one of the most common surgeries in the United States (per the CDC, over 600,000 are performed annually) 
- Many of them are elective - ie. patients are choosing surgical option over medical for example 
- Reasons for hysterectomy - so many! We review this in some of our other topics such as - Uterovaginal Prolapse (Episode 35) - https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2019/5/5/uterovaginal-prolapse 
- Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (Episode 47) - https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2019/7/28/abnormal-uterine-bleeding-the-basics 
- Acute Uterine Bleeding (Espresso Episode 8) - https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2021/7/11/espresso-acute-uterine-bleeding 
- Gestational Trophoblastic Disease (Episode 55) - https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2019/9/29/4c3svbxi5jlecxdrk1tnvoykxs1y5h 
- Endometrial Cancer (Episode 69) - https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2020/1/12/endometrial-cancer 
- Fibroids (Episode 81) - https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2020/4/12/fibroids 
- Cervical Cancer (Episode 101) - https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2020/12/6/cervical-cancer 
- Placenta Accreta (Episodes 113-114) - https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2021/3/7/placenta-accreta-part-i 
- https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2021/3/14/placenta-accreta-part-ii-management 
 
- Endometriosis (Episode 142-143) - https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2021/10/3/endometriosis-part-i-evaluation-and-diagnosis 
- https://creogsovercoffee.com/notes/2021/10/10/endometriosis-part-ii-treatment 
 
- Just to name a few… and remember, we will only discuss benign reasons 
 
What exactly are the ways to do a hyst anyway and why does route matter?
Note: We won’t go into exact techniques here since we are a podcast. However, some great resources include the Atlas of Pelvic Surgery online: http://www.atlasofpelvicsurgery.com/home.html
Also the textbook by Baggish and Karam: Atlas of Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery
Vaginal hysterectomy
- First type of minimally invasive hysterectomy 
- Advantages - Preferred type of hysterectomy when possible due to no incisions on the abdomen and minimally invasive route 
- High safety and low cost - Meta-analysis of seven trials report similar rates of visceral injury and long-term complication among vaginal and laparoscopic procedures 
 
- Minimally invasive approach associated with faster recovery compared to laparotomy 
 
- Disadvantages - Unfortunately, despite advantages, there are fewer vaginal hysts performed compared to others due to limited training, fewer numbers of hysts overall being performed and greater diversity of operative approaches 
- Must remove cervix with this type of procedure - no option for supracervical hyst 
- Small chance of converting to laparotomy 
 
Laparoscopic hysterectomy
- Usually performed with laparoscopic instruments via 3-4 small ports in the abdomen. Uterus can be morcellated and removed through a bag (morcellate in bag) or via the vagina 
- Increasing in popularity 
- Advantages - Better visualization with minimally invasive surgery 
- Can perform supracervical hyst if needed 
- Can also perform last part vaginally for ease if needed 
- May be easier in some obese patients 
 
- Disadvantages - Requires surgeon skilled in use of laparoscopy 
- Certain patient populations with certain medical illnesses may not tolerate Trendelenburg position or pneumoperitoneum 
- Possibility of conversion to laparotomy 
- Slightly higher rate of vaginal cuff dehiscence compared to other routes of hyst (still low, like 0.64-1.1%) 
 
Robotic hysterectomy
- Very similar overall in terms of advantages and disadvantages to laparoscopic hysterectomy due requiring Trendelenburg and pneumoperitoneum, as well as minimally invasive course 
- Advantages - Superior visualization compared to traditional laparoscopy due to ability to move camera and 3D vision 
- Mechanical improvement - wrists with robots 
- Better stabilization of instruments 
- Improved ergonomics for surgeons - you can sit down (as someone who has definitely passed out during a long case) 
- Even more options for minimally invasive routes (ie. single port hyst) 
 
- Disadvantages - Additional surgical training 
- Does not necessarily decrease time (in fact can increase cost and operating room times) - Cost of instruments overall + cost of robot 
 
- Lack of haptics (no tactile feedback) 
 
Abdominal hysterectomy
- Only non minimally-invasive technique 
- Advantages - Visualization 
- Ability to remove large masses and large uteruses 
- Tactile feedback 
- Lowest risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence compared to other methods 
- Studies like the VALUE study and the eVALuate trial showed decreased rates of complications of abdominal hyst compared to laparoscopic hyst, but these studies are also old (1990s) 
 
- Disadvantages - Increased postoperative pain and length of stay (average LOS is 3 days after abdominal hyst) 
- Increased risk of bleeding and infection 
- Increased risk of VTE (also may be due to increased stasis) 
- Increased risk of colonic stasis 
 
How do we pick the route of hysterectomy?
Consideration of minimally invasive routes
- MIS should be considered whenever possible because of well-documented advantages over abdominal hysterectomy 
- Vaginal hyst is preferred over other types due to cost, effectiveness, and overall outcomes 
- Even if opportunistic salpingectomy is desired, these can be performed with vaginal hysterectomy 
Anatomy
- Size and shape of vagina and uterus + descent of uterus 
- More difficult to perform a vaginal hysterectomy if there is no descent, if there is large uterus (bulky fibroids) and small introitus - However, nulliparity is not a contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy 
- Study showed that 92% of vaginal hysterectomies planned for women with no prior vaginal deliveries could be successfully completed 
 
- Accessibility of the uterus also important - is there likely to be a lot of pelvic adhesive disease? (endometriosis) - Large uterine size - morcellation has come under scrutiny previously 
- However, still can morcellate in a bag 
- Even if large, bulky uterus, can refer to skilled MIS surgeon 
 
- Need of concurrent procedures (ie. will the patient need their appendix removed as well?) 
- Work up: - Physical exam with evaluation of mobility of uterus on bimanual 
- Evaluation for adnexal masses on bimanual 
- Feel for fundal height 
- Pelvic ultrasound may be helpful 
 
Surgeon comfort/preference
- Surgeon preference for other operative routes - no longer considered an appropriate reason to avoid vaginal approach 
- Surgeon experience - Average case volume 
- Available hospital technology, devices, and support 
 
Patient preference
- If patient desires supracervical hysterectomy, will need laparoscopic or abdominal approach 
- However, no clinically significant difference in complication and uncertain benefit in terms of patient outcomes (ie. sexual function, urinary function, bowel function) 
ACOG CO 701

 
             
             
            